Table 3 Comparison among the performances of P2Rank, DeepSurf, PUResNetV1.0, DeepSite, and PUResNetV2.0 on benchmark datasets
Benchmark dataset | Methods | Success rate (DCA ≤ 4Å) (%) | Success rate (DCC ≤ 4Å) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
Coach100 | P2Rank | 44.0 | 29.0 |
DeepSurf | 51.0 | 26.0 | |
PUResNetV1.0 | 51.0 | 38.0 | |
DeepSite | 27.0 | 15.0 | |
PUResNetV2.0 | 59.0 | 38.0 | |
Holo801 | P2Rank | 74.0 | 48.2 |
DeepSurf | 83.8 | 46.5 | |
PUResNetV1.0 | 2 | 0.9 | |
DeepSite | 71.4 | 33.8 | |
PUResNetV2.0 | 85.4 | 53.7 | |
Apoholo45 | DeepSurf | 46.7 | 16.7 |
PUResNetV2.0 | 71.1 | 40.0 |