Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | Journal of Cheminformatics

Fig. 6

From: Comparative evaluation of methods for the prediction of protein–ligand binding sites

Fig. 6

Ligand binding site prediction benchmark at the pocket level. These curves correspond to the default predictions of the thirteen methods, indicated by (d) preceding their names. A Recall, percentage of observed sites that are correctly predicted by a method within the top-N+2 predictions; B recall using DCC = 12 Å but considering increasing rank thresholds, i.e., top-N, N+1, N+2, etc. ALL represents the maximum recall of a method, obtained by considering all predictions, regardless of their rank or score; C recall curve of top-N+2 predictions using Irel as a criterion; D ROC100 curve (cumulative TP against cumulative FP until 100 FP are reached); E precision curve for the top-1000 predictions of each method across the LIGYSIS dataset, Precision1K. Error bars represent 95% CI of the recall (AC) and precision (E), which is 100 × proportion. Numbers at the right of the panels indicate groups or blocks of methods that perform similarly for each metric. Asterisks (*) indicate outlier methods, or methods that perform very differently than the rest

Back to article page