Fig. 8

A. The RAM usage and B. Disk Space usage during the geometry optimisation protocol of the set of the LoTs, as mentioned in the Methods section. The MP2\(^{Q}\) surpasses the computational requirements of the second most demanded PBEO\(^{Q}\) by large, requiring almost ten fold more time and four fold more virtual resources to complete. C. The RAM usage and D. Disk Space usage during the single point evaluation protocol. The HF\(^{Q}\) seems to be on par with the RAM usage to that of MP2\(^{Q}\). While for Disk Space usage, the HF\(^{Q}\) and PBEO\(^{Q}\) tend to run relatively similar. The MP2\(^{Q}\), however, tumultuous. This is likely due to 35 SPE calculations are happening concurrently, and finishing at relatively the same pace. This means that tmp-files are constantly being written to, from and deleted, which gives rise to a high fluctuation in the storage on disk. On all graphs, the HF-3c is barely visible as it finished so quickly and requires barely any resources to run successfully